Good Papers

Showing papers from Heidelberg University Show all papers

57%Worth a look
?Worth a lookVote to see the score
NeurIPS 2026SpotlightHeidelbergTechnical University of MunichU HeidelbergImage restoration

Do Image Editing Models Understand Lighting?

Tim Küchler, Johann-Friedrich Feiden, Matthias Niessner, Carsten Rother

Sydney Poster Session 1, Tue, Dec 8, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
1/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 1 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 1/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
45%Niche pick
?Niche pickVote to see the score
NeurIPS 2026International Institute of InforInternational Institute of InforHeidelbergMBZUAIIndian Institute of Technology BVision-language models

CrossWeave: Emergent Cross-Modal Scene and Instance Retrieval from Sparse 2D-3D Alignment

Aadith Warrier, Gnana Prakash Punnavajhala, Siddharth Tourani, Muhammad Haris Khan and 2 more

Sydney Poster Session 6, Thu, Dec 10, 5:00 PM–8:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
0/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 0 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 0/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
80%Must read
?Must readVote to see the score
NeurIPS 2026Ruprecht-Karls-Universität HeideHeidelbergIWR, HeidelbergTime series foundation models

A Minimal Interpretable Architecture for Zero-Shot Reconstruction of Dynamical Systems

DynaBase, a two-parameter model blending latent states with nearest in-context neighbors, achieves competitive zero-shot dynamical reconstruction with orders-of-magnitude fewer parameters.

Christoph Jürgen Hemmer, Florian Plaswig, Daniel Durstewitz

Sydney Poster Session 5, Thu, Dec 10, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
12/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 12 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 4/5
medium 7/10
strict 1/5